A Virginia Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit judge reversed a district court’s dismissal of a lawsuit involving the shooting of a beloved family pet by Augusta County Deputy Sheriff Michael Roane. The decision was a unanimous (en banc) reversal issued in a published opinion written by Chief Justice Gregory of the Fourth Circuit.

For the first time in this jurisdiction, the Fourth Circuit held that “it is unreasonable for a police officer to shoot a privately owned animal when it does not pose an immediate threat to the officer or others.” The court further held that “a reasonable officer in Roane’s position would have known that his alleged conduct was unlawful at the time of the shooting in this case.”

The plaintiff, Tina Ray, is an Augusta county resident who was arrested last year for misdemeanor domestic assault. During the arrest, Deputy Sheriff Roane arrived on the scene, drove past other officers already parked on Ray’s driveway, and parked his vehicle on Ray’s yard where she kept her dog, a German Shepherd named Jax.

Jax was secured on a zip line leash and had no incidents with other police. Upon Roane’s stepping onto the lawn, a frightened Jax approached the officer, barking, but was restrained by the leash. According to court documents, Roane took a step toward the dog, pulled his firearm, and shot Jax with a close-range shot to the head. Initially suspended, the Augusta County Sheriff’s Department later argued that its officer’s actions were “reasonable.”

“We are pleased that the Fourth Circuit reversed based on the law and facts,” Mario Williams, President of Nexus Derechos Humanos Attorneys, said. “Ms. Ray still has a way to go, but we will fight hard to vindicate her rights.”

The case was initially dismissed by United States District Court Judge Elizabeth Dillion, but the case has been on appeal in the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit until it was reversed this week. The case now returns to the District Court for trial.

“Finally, the 4th Circuit has said what we all know: that police have no business killing family pets,” Mike Donovan, President and CEO of Nexus Services, Inc. whose company funds Nexus Derechos Humanos, said. “I’m only saddened that the law only permits a civil remedy here. The officer should be prosecuted for animal cruelty. Jax was a part of Tina’s family, and Michael Roane’s irreparable act ripped that family apart. Not only should he be forced to pay, he should be removed from law enforcement privileges and be held accountable for his crimes.”

(1) comment


So without reading the document, I can see why you folks have now published this months-old story the way that you have.

The Court of Appeals ruled as it did because they were confined to the allegations made by the plaintiff in the complaint by the slip and fall attorney, Mario Williams. This is the 6th or 7th frivolous lawsuit they've filed against this Deputy, most of which have been tossed, as this one will be at Summary Judgment.

The Court HAS NO CHOICE but to accept all of the allegations contained within the Complaint as true at this stage of the legal proceedings.

I'm not really sure why you're publishing this story only now...perhaps it would be more interesting to your readers if you published or republished the stories about all of the criminal and civil investigations relating to Nexus Services — especially since that criminal enterprise has offices in Fairfax?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.